Razgovor:Slovio: razlika između inačica

Izbrisani sadržaj Dodani sadržaj
Donatus (razgovor | doprinosi)
replies to Donatus and Kubura
Redak 26:
 
:::I don't think the Berger's article has been discussed properly at the en wiki. The fact that a notable slavist is including the language in his article, for me is enough to leave this article here. I'm just suggesting to include a notice in our article about wikipedia's role in promoting this language (as it apeares from the discussion at en wiki). I think some Berger's critical positions on slovio should also be included in this article. I'm not a fan of slovio (or any constructed language), and I don't really see the point of inventing them, but I think the information about this one shouldn't be deleted (btw, I noticed we live in the same country :).--[[Suradnik:Donatus|Donatus]] 09:24, 6. kolovoz 2007. (CEST)
 
::::Israel?? --[[Suradnik:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 10:13, 6. kolovoz 2007. (CEST)
 
Za umjetni jezik slovio sam čuo i bez wikipedije, i od svih umjetnih slavenskih jezika, taj je najpoznatiji. To mu daje na značaju. Brisanje stranice o slovio je veliki propust na en.wiki, jedna velika pogrješka, jedna velika glupost. Wikipedija je enciklopedija, koja ovakve stvari uključiva. [[Suradnik:Kubura|Kubura]] 09:37, 6. kolovoz 2007. (CEST)
:If you think that deleting Slovio from en.wiki was a big mistake, you are welcome to create it again, but you need to prove its notability first.
Vrati se natrag na stranicu »Slovio«.