Ostavite mi novu poruku klikom ovdje
Arhiv

Arhivi razgovora



Nagrada

uredi
 
Nagrada za glazbeni doprinos
Dodijelio:
SveroH


--DJ SveroH   Kontakt 23:42, 25. lipnja 2010. (CEST)

nema na čemu, i naravno da možeš :D--DJ SveroH   Kontakt 13:17, 26. lipnja 2010. (CEST)

Oprosti Luka, donedavno nisam znao kako da ti se obratim, neću više ponoviti te greške.Samo me nemoj više blokirati, molim te. Ante92 (razgovor) 15:54, 26. lipnja 2010. (CEST)

Dobar dan Luka,

interesirala bi me jedna informacija vezana uz unosenje sadrzaja u Wiki. Ako imam svoje web stranice u HTML-u i zeljela bi ih uvuci u Wiki, postoji li neki jednostavni nacin da ih se ukljuci u Wiki i da ostanu zaokruzena cjelina ili se treba raditi sve clanak po clanak? Hvala Isaric (razgovor) 16:35, 21. srpnja 2010. (CEST)

Imam jedan problem, ja sam svoj članak "Edgar Davids" završio ima dosta vremena, a na dnu članka piše kako je članak nedovršen i da ga treba dovršiti po pravilima Wikipedia. Možeš li mi pomoći kako da to maknem da više ne piše. — Prethodni nepotpisani komentar napisao je Ante92 (razgovordoprinosi) 15:35, 1. rujna 2010.

novi suradnik

uredi

Bok, htjela bi pomoci s prevodenjem, ne znam kak poceti?--IrenaK (razgovor) 11:36, 15. siječnja 2011. (CET)

U tekstu o biskupu Valentinu Pozaiću krivo je naveden podatak da ga je biskupom imenovao papa Benedikt XVI. Biskupa Pozaića imenovao je papa Ivan Pavao II. pa Vas lijepo molim da taj podatak ispravite. Hvala.

s. Jasminka Gašparović — Prethodni nepotpisani komentar napisao je 78.1.115.44 (razgovordoprinosi)

Nutella i

uredi

Luka, napravih ti malo nereda   na jednoj od tvojih podstranica i čestitam ti pet dana ranije petuuuuu obljetnicu preslatkih uspomena 70px :**********    ;-)) --Roberta F. 01:04, 20. ožujka 2011. (CET)

Stilska dorada

uredi

Prije dvije godine sam počeo pisati na wikipediji. Moj prvi uradak je bio "Prvenstvo Hrvatske i Slavonije u nogometu 1912./13.". S obzirom da sam još "učio" imao sam dosta i pogrešaka. Između ostalog trebalo je članak "stilski urediti". To sam ovih dana i uradio, pa me zanima da li je to sada to, ili treba još nešto poduzeti. Pozdrav Pluki (razgovor) 09:18, 16. lipnja 2011. (CEST)

prijatelju htjeo sam samo da kazem da na stranici oskari za najbolji film,lista nagradjenih filmova je pomjerena za godinu unazad pa recimo film Gladijator koji je oskara dobio za najbolji film je prikazan u godini 2000.a osvojen je 2001.tako su sve redom filmovi pogresno napisani.postovanje i moj pozdrav.Dalibor Puzic188.124.193.244 18:27, 10. rujna 2011. (CEST)Odgovor

Prijava

uredi

Poštovani,

Javljam vam se u nadi da ćete mi pomoći rješiti problem. Zovem se Nikola Pavlaković i suradnik sam ovdje. Htio sam urediti neki članak, ali kod prijave se nisam mogao prijaviti. Lozinku znam sigurno jer koristim uvijek istu, a očito je problem u korisničkom imenu. Probao sam sve koje inače upotrebljavam ali ništa. Sjećam se da sam s vama već razgovarao kad sam tek počeo uređivati članke ovjde, pa sam se sjetio da mi možda možete pomoći, ili ako ne vi, da me uputite na nekoga tko bi možda to mogao rješiti.

Hvala

Nikola Pavlaković

Pozdrav! Pretpostavljam da je tvoja suradnička stranica onda Suradnik:Nikola Pavlakovic. Ne pada mi na pamet ništa, osim da si možda zabunom napisao dijakritičke znakove u suradničkom imenu - jer prijavljen si pod Nikola Pavlakovic, ne Nikola Pavlaković. Ukoliko se i dalje ne budeš mogao prijaviti, preporučam da se prijaviš pod novim suradničkim imenom (što je inače praksa suradnika koji zaborave lozinku). LukaKrstulović 21:28, 24. rujna 2011. (CEST)Odgovor

Hvala, upravo to je bio problem. Pozdrav — Prethodni nepotpisani komentar napisao je Nikola Pavlakovic (razgovordoprinosi)

Kategorija

uredi

Luka, pogledaj Razgovor o kategoriji:Arhitekti i graditelji u Hrvatskoj i Razgovor o kategoriji:Arhitektura u Hrvatskoj..., kategorija "Hrvatski arhitekti" obrisana je nakon rasprave :-)) --Roberta F. 18:26, 30. listopada 2011. (CET)Odgovor

Drago Pilsel

uredi

Poštovani Luka, nasumce sam te odabrao kao suradnika W. pa pitam: Vidim da članak o meni sadržava mnoštvo nepreciznosti i da je loše napisan. Kako je moguće, što treba se učiniti, da čitatelji W o meni dobiju elementarne i točne informacije? Zahvaljujem.

Drago Pilsel, novinar i teolog, Zagreb, d.pilsel@zamir.net

Account rename

uredi

Hello. I'm sorry if this is not the right place to request it, but I request renaming my following accounts:

  • محمد الجداوي → Avocato
  • GedawyBot → AvocatoBot
  • Confirmation link: [1]
  • Reason: Privacy reasons

Please, delete all my userpages and talk pages of these accounts before renaming and I will create them later .Thanks in advance.--M.Gedawy 12:42, 15. srpnja 2012. (CEST)

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 15:29, 3. svibnja 2013. (CEST)

Pošto ne mogu kontaktirati vašeg suradnika Kuburu zanima me zašto je obrisana stranica Zeleni filmski festival.

Lijep pozdrav

Joakim Stulli i Torinski rječnik

uredi

Zdravi bili. Ako sam se dobro snašao, Vi ste u tekst o Stulliju unijeli dopunu u kojoj se, među, inim, navodi da je Stulli u početku svoga leksikografskog rada (nedugo nakon 1760) koristio talijanski Torinski rječnik.

Ako sam pogrešno deducirao, pa to nije Vaš doprinos, ispričavam se, ali Vas molim da pogledate i Vi, tko je to unio. Ako je pak Vaša dopuna, recite mi na koji ste rječnik konkretno mislili, jer ja ga nisam kadar identificirati (Vocabolario della Crusca nije u tom stoljeću izdan u Torinu, Tommaseov je izdan u sljedećem stoljeću itd.)

Ili ću nešto naučiti, ili je možda posrijedi neka zabuna koju bi bilo bolje razjasniti.

Molim Vas da ovo shvatite krajnje dobronamjerno. Poštovanje, --Inoslav (razgovor) 13:28, 30. ožujka 2014. (CEST)

An important message about renaming users

uredi

Dear Luka Krstulović, My aplogies for writing in English. Please translate or have this translated for you if it will help. I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) talk 20:24, 25. kolovoza 2014. (CEST)Odgovor

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Your administrator and bureaucrat status

uredi

Hello. A policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on the wiki listed above. Since that wiki does not have its own rights review process, the global one applies.

If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights.

If you wish to resign your rights, you can reply here or request removal of your rights on Meta.

If there is no response at all after approximately one month, stewards will proceed to remove your administrator and/or bureaucrat rights. In ambiguous cases, stewards will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact the stewards. --Melos (razgovor) 21:36, 12. travnja 2017. (CEST)